Re: [visionlist] [cvnet] RE: Beall’s List gone darkPosted: January 30, 2017
I guess this is somewhat similar to Publon’s approach, where you can decide for yourself whether a journal is potentially trustworthy by looking at their number of reviewers and endorsers: http://ift.tt/2jHZsjj
More information here: http://ift.tt/2jLRT9a
However, in their article they also acknowledged that this number-heavy approach can undermine the legitimacy of new (but reputable) journals/publishers (such as Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, for example). But anyway, one more option on the table.