Re: [visionlist] [cvnet] RE: Beall’s List gone dark

I guess this is somewhat similar to Publon’s approach, where you can decide for yourself whether a journal is potentially trustworthy by looking at their number of reviewers and endorsers:

More information here:

However, in their article they also acknowledged that this number-heavy approach can undermine the legitimacy of new (but reputable) journals/publishers (such as Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, for example).  But anyway, one more option on the table.




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s